Feeds:
Posts
Comments

“GANGS OF London” (Max)

When the Brit series “Gangs of London” premiered in 2020 on AMC  it dished up the most graphic violence ever seen on mainstream cable. 

Each episode was highlighted by at least one state-of-the-art fight scene…sometimes featuring firearms, often with bladed weapons, frequently with fists, feet and teeth.

We’re talking John Wick-level action choreography melded with a gruesome  attention to the trauma inflicted on the human body. Sometimes balletic but mostly brutal.  In the middle of the first season nearly an entire episode was devoted to the siege of a remote farmhouse by a small army of mercenaries…it was an astounding action set piece comparable to Sam Peckinpah’s “The Wild Bunch.”

“Gangs…” Season Two just dropped on Max and, if anything, it raises the ante on onscreen mayhem.

The premise is pretty much summed up in the title.  Various gangs representing different ethnic groups (Pakistanis, Irish, Kurdish, etc.) vie for supremacy of the London underworld.  The authorities are conspicuous in their absence…apparently standard-issue law enforcement is utterly ineffective in curtailing the carnage.

Our nominal hero is undercover cop Elliott (Sope Dirisu) who infiltrates the gang led by the demented mother/son duo Marian and Sean Wallace (Michelle Fairley, Joe Cole). The idea is to undermine the Wallaces from within, but to prove his loyalty (and to elude discovery) Elliott must participate in the gang’s reign of terror. He’s the closest thing we have to a moral authority, but even he has way too much blood on his hands.

This being a Brit production, the acting is top-notch.  Season Two features the arrival of the loathsome Koba (Waleed Zuaiter), a platinum-haired enforcer from Georgia (the eastern European Georgia, not the American one) tasked with ending the infighting whether the warring gangs like it or not.  Kidnapping and torturing the wife of an uncooperative gangster is all in a day’s work for this ruthless killer…Koba may be the year’s best heavy.

Season Two also raises tantalizing questions about “the investors,” a shadowy group of plutocrats (we never see them) who are the mob bosses’ bosses. I have to imagine that Season Three (now in production) will find Elliott exposing their Koch-level shenanigans.

Just about every aspect of “Gangs of London” works.  The question is whether you can handle the series’ pervasive nihilism and unapologetic barbarity.  Because no matter how you approach it, you’ll  end up rooting for one of the bad guys.

“RESERVATION DOGS” (Hulu)

Apparently the world is made up of two kinds of viewers: Those who immediately recognized the genius of “Reservation Dogs” and those of us who discover it later.

When the show debuted in 2021 I gave it a go, but couldn’t slip into its distinctive vibe about slacker teens growing up hopeless on an Oklahoma Indian Reservation. There was something about the pseudo-amateurish performances that rubbed me the wrong way.

Or maybe it was some weird sort of white privilege. “Rez Dogs” has been written, directed and overwhelmingly acted by Native Americans, and it is unapologetic in unfolding from a distinctively N.A. point of view. To an old white guy it didn’t seem a good fit.

A friend, however, encouraged me start again, this time with Season Two.  I did…and am eternally thankful for the recommendation.

Most of the Season Two episodes put one or more of the characters through an experience that is simultaneously universal and specifically Native American.

One features young Bear (D’Pharaoh Woon-A-Tai) taking his first paying job…as a roofer. His experiences with the older crew members widen his perspectives and his growing satisfaction at delivering a good day’s work suggests his gentle shift toward maturity. 

An entire episode is devoted to the death of the grandmother of Elora (Devery Jaccobs).  Virually every major cast member shows up to pay their respects to the fading matriarch, and the interplay among them beautifully reflects the humor, loss and resignation experienced during such a pivotal moment. 

Gay kid Cheese (Lane Factor) finds himself in juvie (he was visiting his weed-growing uncle when the cops arrived).  And a handful of aunties travel to a Native American confab in a big hotel…it’s a chance to leave the rez behind, party like their old former selves and maybe snag a fine man.

The shows are funny, yes. The characters are periodically visited by the spirits of long-gone tribal members, like William Knifeman, a horse-riding, joke-telling warrior who is far more laid back than intimidating, and Deer Lady, a beautiful but vengeful creature who gruesomely settles scores with folk who have lived badly.

And in one absurdity-drenched segment straight arrow tribal cop Big (Zahn McClarnon) accidentally takes an acid trip and in the woods stumbles across a coven of white Oklahoma businessmen planning to seize Indian land.

But there’s a growing seriousness that comes to its full fruition in Season Three.  The overarching theme has the kids little by little coming to terms with just what means to be Indian. Though they are acutely aware of the ridiculous elements of their existence (a touchy-feely session with a couple of wannabe New-Agey Native American gurus is simultaneously hilarious and creepy), these young people are developing a sense of community and discovering a new respect for traditions.

The last few episodes pretty much left me an emotional wreck. But you know what? The kids are gonna be alright.

“WINNING TIME: THE RISE OF THE LAKERS DYNASTY” (MAX)

You don’t have to know anything about basketball to become a big fan of “Winning Time,” whose two seasons chronicle the rise of the L.A. Lakers and provide a veritable smorgasbord of acting treats.

As in most sports sagas there are ups and downs on the court, but the game itself takes a backseat to the potent characters drawn from real-life personalities.

These outsized egos include team owner and dedicated Lothario Jerry Buss (John C. Reilly), his doting mother (Sally Field), charming/naughty court superstar Magic Johnson (Quincy Isaiah), Kareen Abdul Jabbar (Solomon Hughes) and coaches like Jerry West (Jason Clarke),  Pat Riley (Adrien Brody), Paul Westhead (Jason Segel) and Jack McKinney (Tracy Letts).

Season Two spends a lot of time with the Lakers’ nemesis, Larry Bird (Sean Patrick Small).

As far as I can tell, the series sticks pretty close to the historic truth, although clearly the writers have had to invent what went on behind closed doors.  I particularly love that the show is not in awe of its sugjects…there is a full panoply of human foible on display.

And the look of it all! Rarely have we seen a series which so consistently captures the visual and aural sensations of a past  era, in this case the 1980s. The makers of “Winning Time” dig up old newsfilm and video, but they also employ (or masterfully fake) now-abandoned visual formats.

The result is a series that feels more like a time machine than a conventional TV show.

| Robert W. Butler


“EL CONDE”  My rating: B (Netflix)

110 minutes | MPAA rating: R

As a rule, political strongmen despise artists, dismissing them as dreamers and dissenters always threatening to infect the body politic with their decadence.

Thing is, given enough time the artists always have the last word.

Exhibit A is “El Conde (The Count),” a Chilean feature that informs us that right-wing dictator Augusto Pinochet did not die in 2006, as is widely believed, but lives on as a vampire who sucks the life out of unsuspecting victims just as he sucked up the wealth of his country.

Written and directed by Pablo Larrain (who co-wrote with Guillermo Calderon), this batshit-crazy blend of horror and political satire plays out in an otherworldly, treeless landscape that has been magnificently captured in Edward Lachman’s sumptuous black-and-white photography.

Here’s the setup: The aged Count (Jaime Vadell) is slowly losing his marbles in a sort of sprawling ranch house that has seen better days.  (It must be the only homestead on Earth that features a functioning guillotine.)

His wife Lucia (Gloria Munchmyer), his butler and (during the good old days) chief torturer Fyodor (Alfred Castro) and the Count’s four back-biting adult children have gathered in emergency session. They all fear that the world-weary old dictator will starve himself to death before they can figure out where he squirreled away his ill-gotten fortune.

To help sort it all out, the family has employed a forensic accountant, a young woman named Carmencita (Paula Luchsinger).  What they don’t know is that Carmencita is a nun who has traded in her habit for street clothes. What’s more, she has orders to perform an exorcism on the evil old bastard.

Paula Lunchsinger

(Am I imagining, or are Luchsinger’s sharp features and boyish ‘do lit and photographed in such a way as to evoke memories of Falconetti’s Joan of Arc?)

While the characters deliver their lines in Spanish, the story is narrated by a female with an English accent.  Initially this is puzzling…before it’s all over we’ll meet this woman face-to-face, confirming our worst fears about a once-powerful world leader.  (Yeah, that’s kinda vague. 
But the late-reel reveal is too delicious to give it up here.)

In flashbacks we see how as a young soldier in the French revolution the Count developed a taste for blood (he actually licks the blade that beheads Marie Antoinette) and a hatred of revolutionaries and lefties in general.  (How did he become a vampire?  It will be revealed, but not here.)

Eventually he made his way to the Americas,  became a ruthless military leader and took over Chille after a CIA-planned 1972 overthrow of Salvador Allende’s freely-elected socialist government.  For more than 20 years Pinochet ruled with an iron hand, “disappearing” more than 1200 troublesome citizens and torturing countless others.

Gloria Munchmyer, Jaime Vadell

According to this film’s alternate history, when finally deposed and facing conviction for human rights violations, the Count faked  his own death and retreated to his remote hideout.

Periodically, though, he dons his old caped uniform and glides through the night sky to Santiago to feast on humanity.  These flying scenes are spectacularly dreamlike…even beautiful in a balletic way.

 “The Conde” has a fine old time fiddling with the usual vampire tropes, and its gleeful indictment of reactionary politics and the pilfering that so often accompanies it is absolutely merciless.

There’s a built-in issue with the film…none of the characters — not even the undercover nun — is remotely likable.  Everybody is greedy, scheming, corrupt.  Or willing to be corrupted.

Thankfully the acting, the allegorical elements and the mind-blowing technical expertise (photography, locations, costuming, production design) are so inventive that there’s always something marvelous to wonder at.

The film would probably have benefitted from a tighter edit (lose 15 minutes and you might have a small masterpiece), but as it stands “El Conde” is a nasty miracle.

| Robert W. Butler

Benedict Cumberbatch

“THE WONDERFUL STORY OF HENRY SUGAR”  My rating: A (Netflix)

37 minutes | MPAA rating: PG

At the risk of committing  cinematic apostasy, I’d like to suggest that in the future Wes Anderson limit himself to short films.

I have come to this conclusion after viewing Anderson’s “The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar,” 37 minutes of visual and aural bliss emphasizing all that is great about the Anderson style without ever wearing out its welcome.

Hanging  around too long has been the major flaw of Anderson’s recent features like  “Asteroid City” and “The French Dispatch,” quirky whimsy being an elusive thing to sustain over 90 minutes.

But “…Henry Sugar,” based on a short story by the late Roald Dahl, is a pure delight. the ideal marriage of material and presentational form.

It’s not so much an adaptation of Dahl’s yarn as a word-for-word recitation, with the cast members (familiar faces from the Anderson screen universe)  speaking the author’s words directly to the viewer.

What’s it about?  Well, it begins in the yellow cottage in which Dahl (Ralph Fiennes) does his writing.  Dahl tells us the story of “The Man Who Sees Without Using His Eyes.”  

Through a delightful series of interlocking flashbacks (stories within stories within stories…a familiar Anderson device) we follow Imdad Khan (Ben Kingsley), who as a young man in the 1930s became a devotee of a holy Indian hermit and learned to identify objects — like playing cards — even though his eyes have been completely bandaged. 

Ralph Fiennes

The adult Khan exploits this skill as one of the main attractions of a traveling vaudeville show. Along the way he becomes the obsession of a physician (Dev Patel) bent on understanding this phenomenon.

Eventually the yarn turns to wastrel Henry Sugar (Benedict Cumberbatch), an upperclass Brit ne’er-do-well addicted to gambling.  Sugar finds a journal written by Khan in a fellow rich twit’s library, steals it, and studies it for several years with singleminded intensity..

Sugar wants to employ Khan’s remote viewing system to read the cards held by his fellow casino denizens. He pulls it off…only to realize that gambling is no longer thrilling when you know you can’t lose.

The story is oddball charming and even has a nifty moral to it.

And the presentational style is, well, beautiful. The film is awash in pastel eruptions, with sets that often resemble huge doll houses and at other times fold up or open out like gigantic pop-up books.  

| Robert W. Butler

Willem Dafoe

“INSIDE” My rating: C+ (Prime Video)

105 minutes “ MPAA rating: R

Before drifting away into ambiguity, Vasillis Katsoupis’ “Inside” serves as both a reasonably diverting escape tale and as a one-man acting showcase for Willem Dafoe.

It begins with a high-tech burglary.  Dafoe’s Nemo (we only know the character’s name from the credits) is dropped by helicopter onto the roof of an NYC high rise.  He makes his way to the penthouse, a sprawling living space that takes up the entire top floor.

The towering walls are covered with expensive modern art…and that’s why Nemo is there. The absent owner of this palace has a collection worth millions; Nemo and his confederates (we only hear them through the walkie-talkie he carries) have a shopping list of items to steal.

But it all goes haywire.  The apartment’s security system is way more sophisticated than the robbers thought, and within minutes of arriving Nemo finds himself locked inside. His partners in crime sign off, leaving him to whatever fate awaits.

It’s kind of like Robinson Crusoe with a panoramic view of Manhattan.

Nemo’s desperate attempts to disarm the security system are disastrous.  Over the course of his imprisonment the apartment’s damaged climate controls send the temperature soaring to 100 or dropping almost to freezing. Our man spends days sweltering in his skivvies, and then must bundle up in pilfered clothing as the temp plummets.

More bad news: His tinkering has rendered inoperable the in-house phone that otherwise could be used to call the front desk downstairs.

The apartment’s owner apparently turned off the utilities before leaving for an extended European vacation, so Nemo has neither running water nor gas with which to cook the few items he finds frozen in the fridge. Luckily a couple of tropical trees in a huge planter are periodically watered by tiny hoses connected to a timer, so Nemo strategically places cups and saucers to collect the daily spray.

He can’t even watch TV.  The big set in the living room will only deliver feeds from security cameras around the building, so our man must find entertainment eavesdropping on residents and staffers — especially a pretty young maid he dubs Jasmine (Eliza Stuyck).

“Inside” chronicles in minute detail Nemo’s day-to-day survival regimen and his escape attempts, which include building a shaky scaffolding of cannibalized furniture in an attempt to reach a skylight 20 feet overhead.

Dafoe embodies the character’s physical and mental deterioration with virtually no dialogue. Nor are there flashbacks to tell us anything about Nemo’s past.  Is he just a thief or is he also an art lover?  (Would an art lover paint mustaches on the priceless portraits on the walls?) At one point he passes the time by drawing his own mural on a wall.

It’s all very minimalist and for at least its first half “Inside” is a gripping survival story.

But “Inside” wears out its welcome, slipping ever more deeply into improbability.  Example: Nemo deliberately starts a fire, setting off sprinklers that leave him ankle-deep in water.  Yet apparently the rest of the building is unaware of the deluge…I mean, wouldn’t all that water leak down to the floors below?

Perhaps the biggest bugaboo, though, is Katsoupis and co-writer Ben Hopkins’ decision to leave us hanging without a clear resolution. They probably thought of it as artful.  I kinda felt like it was a cheat.

| Robert W. Butler

Molly Gordon, Ben Platt

“THEATER CAMP” My rating: C+ (Hulu)

92 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

The people who made “Theater Camp” are, quite obviously, former child actors.

Which is why anyone who ever devoted a few formative months of their youth to singing, dancing and dreaming of stardom will find this film triggers a tsunami of fond memories.

For some that will be enough.

I wanted more. 

Maybe it’s because “Theater Camp” — written by Noah Galvin, Molly Gordon and Nick Lieberman and directed by Gordon and Lieberman —is a bit too much in love with its own mythology to bring out the knives.

I was hoping for “Waiting for Guffman”-level laughs.“ What I got was a bunch of narrative backstage cliches without the really biting satire that would lift the film from the modestly amusing to the truly memorable.

Here’s the setup: Joan Rudinsky, the long-time founder/director of Camp AdirondACTS  (played in a prologue by Amy Seders) is hospitalized and in a coma.  In her absence a skeleton staff overseen by her theatrically clueless son Troy (Jimmy Tatro) are struggling to keep their young campers occupied, fed and engaged in producing the summer’s penultimate show, a musical tribute to Joan.

The usual “types” are on display, with the central characters being Angelo and Sylvia (Ben Platt, Gordon) who fell in love when they were students at AdirondACTS and, since Angelo’s coming out, have been best buds.

Problem is, Sylvia  seems to have marketable talents (she’s been asked to audition for a cruise show) while Angelo seems destined never to move beyond the camp.  This makes for some tension.

Meanwhile the inept Troy is considering a buyout from the rival (and much more posh) summer camp across the lake.  Also he’s getting romantically encouraging vibes from the other camp’s CFO (Patti Harrison).

There are some modest laughs here, but the approach is gentle and sweet, possibly the result of the filmmaker’s improvisational approach. The hoped-for avalanche of social comedy never materializes.  

In fact, “Theater Camp” only really comes together in the last reel when the kids put on their big tribute to Joan and in classic movie fantasy fashion transcend amateurism to dleliver an inspired night of musical theater. 

| Robert W. Butler

“UNKNOWN: CAVE OF BONES” My rating: B  (Netflix)

93 minutes | No MPAA rating

One of my all-time favorite documentaries is Werner Herzog’s 2011 “Cave of Forgotten Dreams” in which the eccentric filmmaker took a 3-D camera into a French cave to record the incredible wall paintings of animals rendered more than 30,000 years ago.

The makers of that art were clearly human, and as I noted at the time, “Cave…” is about nothing less than the birth of the human soul.

The perfect bookend to Herzog’s masterwork is “Unknown: Cave of Bones,” Mark Mannucci’s chronicle of the the almost decade-long exploration of the Rising Star cave system in South Africa.

Rising Star contains a treasure trove of bones belonging to hominids that lived between 250,000 and 300,000 years ago.  They were small creatures with brains about the size of a chimpanzee’s. They are regarded as animals, not humans. 

This newly discovered ancient species was dubbed homo naledi.

Early on we meet paleoanthropologist Lee Berger, an American-born South African in charge of the project.  He, along with a couple of colleagues, becomes our narrator and guide into a mystery that stretches back to the beginning of our world.

The deeper explorers penetrated the cave, the more surprises they encountered. 

 Lee Berger

In a room so inaccessible that only the thinnest of scientists could squeeze through to it (Berger tells us up front that  he’ll never see the place save on a video feed…he’s too hefty to make his way there) the team discovered the bones of one  individual who had undergone special treatment.

His/her remains had not been abandoned on the cave floor. They had been deliberately buried. Moreover, the body had to have been carried or dragged up and down a daunting series of chutes, inclines and crawl spaces to get there.

Wait a minute.  Burial implies a social system. It implies that these creatures had the emotional capacity to protect or honor  the remains of a beloved individual.  And it strongly suggests that homo naledi was contemplating an afterlife.

But weren’t these just, well, animals?

It gets better. The scientists discover a burial in which a stone had been placed in the deceased’s hand…a stone that apparently had been knapped to create a sharp edge and a pointed end.  

In other words, a tool.

And cross-hatch patterns are found scratched into the cave wall.  We call that art.

Unfolding as a kind of real-life mystery, “Unknown…” alternates terrific footage from inside the cave with talking head commentary from Berger and fellow primatologists Agustin Fuentes and John Hawks. 

These guys are scientists.  They deal in facts.  They’re uncomfortable with metaphysical postulating.

And yet their worlds are rocked by the notion that 200,000 years before homo sapiens emerged there were creatures exhibiting human-like behavior: funerary rituals, tool creating, art making. Raising the question of just how we’re supposed to define the words “human being.”

Mannucci’s documentary is immeasurably aided by the use of animated sequences to suggest how homo naledi might have looked and moved.  These black-and-white sequences are painterly, blurred just enough to give an idea of this ancient world without depicting details that might not be supported by the evidence.

  The result is a haunting, unexpectedly moving dreamlike experience that leaves the viewer in quiet awe.

| Robert W. Butler

Idris Elba

“HIJACK” (Apple+):  I’d watch Idris Elba clean his ears with a Q-Tip. In “Hijack” he is but one member of an excellent ensemble delivering the year’s best nail-biter.

This seven-part miniseries unfolds in real time.  Shorty after taking off from a Middle East airport, a British passenger jet is taken over by gunmen. Their motivations are unclear until late in the drama, but every episode cannily drops breadcrumb clues that we must sort through.

In that we’re like passenger Sam Nelson  (Elba), a heavy-hitting corporate negotiator flying back to his native London.  Nelson isn’t a man of action. No kung fu, no fisticuffs. He’s a thinker who places himself between the hijackers and the terrified passengers in an effort to prevent what looks increasingly like a high body count.

“Hijack” unfolds not only in the air, where we meet all sorts of passengers — as in John Ford’s “Stagecoach,” they represent all aspects of humankind, good and bad —but also on the ground as the British authorities, air traffic controllers and anti-terrorism experts  try to stave off a worst-case scenario in which the air liner is shot down by military jets.

Perhaps the show’s deeply satisfying complexity is the result of a seven-person writing staff who keep coming up with new and intriguing twists.  Meanwhile directors Jim Field Smith and Mo Ali make the most of the yarn’s claustrophobic elements. 

With its real-time delivery “Hijack” is the perfect one-day binge. 

Timothy Olyphant, Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor

“JUSTIFIED: CITY PRIMIEVAL” (Hulu): More Raylan Givens?  YES, PLEASE.

Timothy Olyphant reprises his signature role as U.S. Marshal Raylan Givens in this eight-parter (too short, but still) that finds our Kentucky-bred lawman working a case in Detroit (as gritty in its own way as coal country).

Nearly 16 years have passed since we last saw Raylan, and if anything he looks sexier than ever.  Maybe it’s because he’s now older and a bit wiser, long divorced and traveling with his teenage daughter, who is way too cocky for her years. (She’s played by Olyphant’s real-life kiddo Vivian…the apple didn’t drop far from this tree).

The villain this time around is Clement Mansell (Boyd Holbrook), a seductive/terrifying good ol’ boy who likes to preen in his tidy whities. Early on Mansell kills a judge and steals his little brown book of bribery.  The idea is to blackmail the “respectable” folk listed in this incriminating volume. 

Toss in Mansell’s grudge match with the local Albanian ganglord (Terry Kinney), his affair with a fortune-hunting casino cocktail waitress (Adelaide Clemens, suggesting the good girl she played in “Rectified” has gone bad),  and an uneasy partnership with a dive bar owner (Vondie Curtis-Hall), and you’ve got plenty of nerve-shredding action.

But there’s more,  with our boy Raylan finding a sympathetic soul in Mansell’s criminal attorney, winning played by Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor. It may be the year’s most unexpected and satisfying TV romance.

Oh…and the final episode ties up loose ends with a coda that damn near rivals the final sendoff of “ Six Feet Under.”

Matthew Goode as Robert Evans, Miles Teller as Al Ruddy

“THE OFFER” (Paramount +): The making of 1972’s “The Godfather” was every bit as gripping as the film itself…at least according to this 10-part miniseries which, we’re told, was inspired by Al Ruddy’s experiences while producing the film.

Miles Teller plays Ruddy, whose track record (“Hogan’s Heroes,” a motorcycle movie) hardly seemed up to adapting Mario Puzo’s best-selling Mafia novel to the big screen.  Basically Ruddy learned the hard way, putting out daily brushfires (budget problems, location hassles) and finding himself aligned with real-world mobster Joe Columbo, who initially opposed the film as being anti-Italian and later padded the production’s payroll with his non-working “workers.”

Teller provides a solid center to the film, but the real fun comes from a small army of  supporting players who chew the scenery with relish:  Matthew Goode as studio head and ladies’ man Robert Evans, Giovanni Ribisi as frog-voiced Joe Columbo, and Brit character actor Burn Gorman as Charles Bluhdorn, the Austrian owner of Paramount and the very image of a capitalist martinet.

Though they have cannily cast actors who sound (and sometimes look) like stars Al Pacino and Marlon Brando, the series’ makers don’t try to re-enact moments from the actual movie.  But frequently we watch the faces of crew members as they oversee a scene being shot, and their awestruck expressions make it clear that movie magic is being captured.

For most viewers “The Offer” will be a huge package of surprise revelations.  Director Frances Coppola (an excellent Dan Fogler) had to fight off numerous attempts by the studio brass to fire Pacino (he was deemed too short, too actorish). The production barely scraped together enough money to send a skeleton crew to Sicily. 

And according to Ruddy’s telling, he was held captive by thug “Crazy” Joe Gallo who demanded money from a production that had none left.

For movie geeks “The Offer” is a total pigout.    And the highest praise is that as soon as you’ve finished it you can’t wait to watch the original “Godfather” one more time.

| Robert W. Butler

Ryan Gosling, Margot Robbie

“BARBIE” My rating: B (Theaters)

114 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

I’m pretty late to the Barbie party, having only just recently caught Greta Gerwig’s “Barbie.” 

Given that I’m playing catch-up, this is less a straightforward review than a collection of observations about what has become a major cultural phenomenon.

You needn’t be a past or present Barbie doll owner to enjoy the movie, but it sure helps.   

The screenplay by Gerwig and significant other Noah Baumbach draws endlessly from the 60-plus-year history of Barbie, going so far as to resurrect as characters discontinued dolls like pregnant Midge, “Ken’s buddy” Allan (an hilarious appearance by Michael Cera as the lone wimp in a sea of muscled Kens), Video Girl Barbie (with a tiny TV screen embedded in her back) and even Sugar Daddy Ken (???).

As someone unfamiliar with all the Barbie permutations, I still found these characters amusing.  But I can only imagine the giddy joy experienced by little girls (now women) who retain fond memories of these long-lost inhabitants of the Barbie universe.

The film is undeniably diverting and occasionally even moving, and packed with visual and aural jokes. But it cannot — in my opinion — live up to all the hype that has been generated since it hit the theaters.

In fact, I found myself becoming bored in the picture’s central section.  For all the diverting eye candy and well-aimed jokes, the characters are still defined by their “doll-ness.” They are commercial objects, and as such remain essentially artificial rather than fully formed.

Within the limitations imposed on them, our Barbie (Margot Robbie) and Ken (Ryan Gosling) are able to suggest a dawning emotional and intellectual depth. But I was never able to accept them as fully human.

There is, however, one moment that almost brought me to tears.

 In the film’s central passage Barbie and Ken are transported to contemporary Los Angeles.  There are plenty of jokes about doll world/real world culture clash.

But in one brief but throat-lumping scene, Barbie sits at a bus stop next to a white-haired old lady.  She stares at the senior citizen for a moment and then says with near-reverence: “You’re beautiful!”

So much going on in just two words.  There are no old people in Barbieworld, of course. The filmmakers could have played this encounter for laughs. But instead of being frightened or repulsed by this vision of mortality, our heroine is awed by the human truth exhibited by one old lady waiting for her bus.

Now that’s a GREAT movie moment.

“Barbie” has it both ways.

The film is a wicked satire of all that the Barbie franchise stands for; at the same time, it is never mean spirited. In fact, it’s a celebration. A balancing act for the ages.

Ryan Gosling is going to win an Oscar.

One bit of hype is absolutely true: Gosling is spectacularly entertaining as the shallow, preening Ken.  It is a great comic performance that isimultaneously generates uproarious laughter while subtly suggesting a dawning consciousness.

The conservatives are right to be terrified.  

The film is an incredibly effective parable about female empowerment, as Barbie (all the Barbies, actually) gain self-awareness. 

Moreover, “Barbie” dives headfirst into political commentary when the Kens establish a Taliban-ish patriarchy over Barbieland. One of the film’s major themes is that of female desire (spiritual, not sexual)  butting heads with male oppression. 

Whether this constitutes man-bashing is in the eye of the beholder.  Our friends on the right seem to think so.

I’m on board with the film’s point of view; even so, there were moments when it felt like Gerwig and Co. were endlessly rearguing their case.  The phrase “beating a dead horse” comes to mind (an appropriate choice, given that a key manifestation of the Kens’ newfound toxic masculinity is an obsession with galloping stallions).

The film feels padded. 

Most of what I found problematic about “Barbie” would have shot right past had the movie been, say, 90 minutes long instead of two hours.  Better too short than too long.

The execs at Mattel  (owners of the Barbie franchise) are either geniuses or idiots — not sure which.

“Barbie” is full of jabs at  corporate culture, going so far as to cast Will Farrell as the bumbling president of Mattel.

How the hell did the screenplay get a pass from the company’s bigwigs?  Since when have corporations developed a sense of humor…particularly self-satire? Like, making fun of their own products?

In the end it doesn’t matter.  By serving as the butt of the filmmakers’ jokes, the corporation has found itself in the midst of a marketing bonanza.  No doubt in the wake of all this sales of all things Barbie  have gone stratospheric. 

Talk about a happy ending.

| Robert W. Butler

Elizabeth Banks, Zac Galifianakis

“THE BEANIE BUBBLE” My rating: B-(Apple+)

110 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Notwithstanding a transformative performance from funny guy Zac Galifianakis and solid work from his three leading ladies, Apple+’s “The Beanine Bubble” left me wondering just what message its creators wanted to send.

Part cautionary tale, part character study, part historical recreation, this feature debut from directors Kristin Gore and Damian Kulash  manages to entertain even while spreading itself so thin that there’s a gaping hole in its middle.

“The Beanie Bubble” is based on the real-world  rise and fall of Ty Warner, a designer whose plush Beanie toys made him a multi billionaire in the 1990s. The Beanies weren’t just huggable animal toys for the kiddies…by some weird quirk of mass psychosis and greed they became unregulated investment instruments. Customers snatched up each new Beanie character with the dream of re-selling the dolls at an immense profit.

Kind of like crypto before crypto.

Galifianakis, Geraldine Viswanathan

The screenplay by Gore and Zac Bissonette (the latter the author of a  best-selling nonfiction study of the Beanie Baby phenomenon) borrows its basic form from no less a cinematic landmark than “Citizen Kane.”  Like Orson Welle’s masterwork, this is a study of an enigmatic individual through the eyes of those who knew him…in this case three women key to Warner’s personal and private life. (We’re told that while fictional, these three characters are based on real women in Warner’s past.)

Moreover, the film assumes a twisted  timeline, darting back and forth between incidents that covered more than a decade.  The tale could easily have been told chronologically; the choice to slice and dice the narrative may have been seen as a way of keeping the audience on its toes.  I frequently found it confusing.

Elizabeth Banks portrays Robbie, a working class gal who under Warner’s tutelage grows from auto repair shop employee to high-powered entrepreneur. She not only partners with Warner to build the Beanie brand, she becomes his lover (despite having a physically handicapped husband whom the film conveniently forgets).  Thing is, their “partnership” was never formalized, so that when the inevitable breakup arrives, Robbie has no legal standing.

Sarah Snook, Galifianakis

The second woman in Warner’s life is Maya (Geraldine Viswanathan), a teen who rejects her parents’ dreams of a medical career to sign on as a part-time receptionist at Warner’s Ty Inc. Maya is a smart cookie who immediately sees the possibilities of marketing Beanie toys through a new invention called the Internet. She’s also the one who realizes that Beanie fans are using newfangled sites like ebay to resell the toys for huge profits, thus creating a market that Ty Inc. may cannily manipulate by limiting the kinds and numbers of new toys manufactured.

Both Robbie and Maya, in their retelling of events, claim that Warner is an insecure child-man, a decent enough designer but a short-sighted businessman, and that it was their innovations that led to the company’s success.  (If customers rioting at toy stores can be considered a success.)

Like Robbie, Maya is financially screwed by Warner, who keeps her on at minimum wage despite her obvious value.

And both women make the case that once they left the company, Warner ran it into the ground, culminating with the burst of the so-called Beanie Bubble that left hundreds of thousands of “investors” holding the bag.

The third voice in all this belongs to Sheila (“Succession’s” Sarah Snook), the single mother of two young girls who finds herself falling for the charmingly boyish Ty Warner. The guy seems too good to be true…and of course he is.

Holding it all together is Galifianakis’ flamboyant turn as Warner.  Despite his outrageous pastel suits and effeminate edges, this is not an overtly comic character.  But he is wildly entertaining, overflowing with infantile enthusiasms and, once you get past the shiny package, some dark interior rumblings. 

It’s a tough gig.  Yeah, there’s plenty of business for an actor to sink his teeth into, but ultimately the Ty Warner we get is the one the three women want us to see.  Galiafanakis has to make his character come alive within the limitations imposed on him by his three narrators.

For those accustomed to Galifaniakis going for the big laugh, be aware that he here keeps himself on a short leash. This may be his best effort yet at pure acting.  He loses himself in the role  (there were times when I forgot it was him). But at heart his character remains something of a maddening mystery.  

| Robert W. Butler

Robert Masser

“BLOOD & GOLD” My rating: B-  (Netflix)

98 minutes |  No MPAA rating

Killing Nazis.  What could be timelier?

And the Netflix actioner “Blood & Gold” spends more than 90 minutes wiping up the floor with Hitler’s odious henchmen. It’s like Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” without the nods to arthouse sensibilities.

Directed by Peter Tornwarth (who co-wrote the screenplay with Stefan Barth), this Czech-lensed bloodbath owes more than a little debt to the traditions of spaghetti Westerns.  The eccentric soundtrack sounds like something found in the effects of the late Ennio Morricone, there’s a big emphasis on hidden treasure (as in “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”) and the film’s scuzzily-bearded  leading man, Robert Masser,  has perfected the Eastwood squint.

Hell, the film even begins with a hanging.

In the last days of WWII German deserter Heindrich (Masser) is run down by his comrades and left dangling from a tree.  He’s cut down by Elsa (Marie Hacke), who brings him to the farm she shares with her mentally-challenged brother Paulie (Simon Rupp).

Elsa and Paulie are no lovers of the Reich; their father was taken away for voicing anti-Hitler sentiments. 

Roy McCrerey, Alexander Scheer

As fate would have it, Heinrich’s former unit — led by the imperious and hideously scarred von Starnfeld (Alexander Scheer in maximum Prussian asshole mode) and his sadistic sergeant (Roy McCrerey) — have decamped to a nearby town. They’re searching for a fortune in gold bars purportedly owned by a Jewish family arrested some years before.  They’ll tear the place apart to find the treasure.

In this they will have competition from a couple of local good ol’ boys and the scheming mistress (Jordan Triebel) of the burg’s pompous/cowardly mayor.

Not to mention the havoc wreaked on the swastika-bedecked crew by Heinrich, Elsa and Paulie, who are motivated not by greed but by revenge.

So there’s not a lot of substance or subtext here.  But this show doesn’t need it.

Thorwarth, whose last film was the nifty vampire-on-an-airliner effort “Blood Red Sky,” is a wiz at staging terrific sequences which push the limits (without ever going too far over the top) of believable mayhem.  I’m tempted to rewatch “Blood & Gold” just so I can fast forward to the action scenes.

Call it a guilty pleasure.

| Robert W. Butler