Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Nicole Kidman’

Harris Dickinson, Nicole Kidman

“BABYGIRL” My rating: B (In theaters)

114 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Films have for so long catered to male ideals of eroticism that“Babygirl” feels almost revolutionary.

Writer/director Halina Reijn’s examination of female frustration and desire offers a situation that we’ve seen many times before: A person in a position of authority gets sexually involved with a person in their employ.

Except this time around the individual in power is a woman and her lover a young man working as an intern at her robotics company.

When we first see Romy (Kidman) she’s having very noisy sex with her husband Jacob (Antonio Banderas). Looks like an ideal relationship — hot action in the bedroom, plenty of money, two teenage daughters, a posh NYC address.

As we’ll learn, Romy has been faking it.  She’s never had an orgasm, at least not one that wasn’t self-administered.

Enter Samuel (Harris Dickinson), an intern whose weird blend of assertive cockiness and laid back coolness Romy first finds maddening, then intriguing.  She reluctantly agrees to mentor Samuel during his stay at the firm…and things start to heat up.

Reijn pulls off the near impossible here by delivering a huge blast of eroticism while avoiding the whole male gaze thing. It’s the most overtly sexual performance of Kidman’s career, but it never veers into exploitation.

Samuel initially brings Romy to a noisy orgasm just with his hands (she’s lying on the floor, fully clothed); when he’s not playing the dominant lover he’s actually quite sweet and attentive.

The problem, of course, is that Romy’s infatuation — her growing recognition that she’s a sexual submissive — threatens her job (h.r. departments frown on this sort of thing) and her marriage.

And when another intern (Sophie Wilde) attempts to blackmail Romy over the affair, her life is turned upside down.

“Babygirl” (that’s Samuel’s nickname for his boss) ends on an upbeat note I’m not sure I buy.  And the film’s first 30 or so minutes felt brittle and off-putting.

 But eventually the plot, the performances and the aura of guilty pleasure click into focus.

Ryan Destiny, Brian Tyree Henry

“THE FIRE INSIDE” My rating: B- (In theaters)

109 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

“The Fire Inside” follows the usual arc of a sports movie, tracing the career of an athlete from childhood to triumph on the world stage.

But it throws a couple of changeups.

First, this is the true story of Claressa “T-Rex” Shields, the first woman to win an Olympic gold medal in boxing — at the tender age of 17.  Guys who want to fight are a dime a dozen, but a girl? And one that young?

Second, the film views the fights themselves as an afterthought.  They’re brief and not particularly violent; mostly they provide the background for a couple of solid character studies and for the emerging theme of female empowerment.

Claressa is played by Ryan Destiny, who nicely captures the drive and determination of a young woman determined to pull herself out of an oppressive domestic situation.

And she’s paired here with Brian Tyree Henry as Jason Crutchfield, the volunteer boxing coach who initially was reluctant to have a girl training in his Flint, Mich., gym, but went on to become Claressa’s mentor and de facto father. 

Henry can play just about anything (he was memorable as a oft-perplexed rapper in “Atlanta”), but his ace in the hole is his ability (we  saw it opposite Jennifer Lawrence in “Causeway”) to express  basic human decency without a trace of self-consciousness. A character like this one makes you want to be a better person.

“The Fire Inside” was written by Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”) and directed by Rachel Morrison, and in addition to exploring a character’s physical and psychological development over several years, it also takes on the struggle of female athletes to achieve economic parity with their male counterparts.

Drew Starkey, Daniel Craig

“QUEER” My rating: B- (In theaters)

136 minutes | MPAA rating: R

The novels of William S. Burroughs have rarely been made into movies.  In part it’s the unapologetic subject matter. Also, there’s rarely anything like a conventional plot.

In tackling “Queer” director Luca Guadagnino (“Call Me By Your Name,” “Challengers,” “Bones and All” ) works hard to find a cinematic equivalent for Burroughs’ distinctive literary style.  And for the first hour or so he pulls it off.

The protagonist (and Burroughs’ alter ego) is William Lee, an American living in Mexico in the 1950s. Apparently Lee has family money. He doesn’t work. Mostly he cruises for young men.

Lee is portrayed by Daniel Craig, an unlikely choice since Craig is one of  the sexiest men in movies and William Lee is an embarrassingly transparent letch on the downside of desirability.  But Craig pulls it off, mining the pathetic yearning of an aging man for some sort of physical and emotional transcendence.

He finds it (he thinks) in Eugene Allerton (Drew Starkey), a  curiously non-committal American (is he gay? straight?) only recently discharged from the military. The guy oozes indifference, which only makes Lee’s clumsy attempts at seduction all the more wince-worthy.

But talk about creating an environment! As sumptuously photographed by Sayombhu Mukdeeprom, “Queer” is simultaneously dreamlike and grittily down to earth.  Moreover, it radiates “Under the Volcano”-level decadent dissolution.

There’s also an amazingly good supporting performance by Jason Schwartzman as Joe Guidry, a character clearly based on Alan Ginsberg. Overweight and astonishingly hairy, Schwartzman utterly loses himself. It’s some of his finest work.

The film’s second half finds Lee and Allerton trekking to South America to dabble in psychedelic plants. There they hang at the jungle research station of a renegade scientist (Lesley Manville, all but unrecognizable), getting ripped on ayahuasca. 

By this time the film’s lack of anything like a real plot becomes a drawback.  As does Starkey’s one-note performance. At well over two hours, “Queer” begs for some tightening.

Still, at various moments it’s a genuinely hallucinogenic experience.

| Robert W. Butler

Read Full Post »

Vince Vaughn

“BAD MONKEY” (Apple +)

Vince Vaughn has been waiting more than 20 years for a role that would perfectly mesh with his droll, super-dry persona.  In “Bad Monkey” he finds it.

As disgraced Key West police detective Andrew Yancy, Vaughn seduces us with virtually every line of dialogue and deadpan expression.  He’s like a beach bum with a badge.

He’s surrounded by a cast of entertaining eccentrics  courtesy of novelist Carl Hiaasen, a former Miami Herald writer whose novels provide a wickedly jaundiced view of Florida’s human fauna.

Created by the great Bill Lawrence (“Scrubs,” “Ted Lasso”), this series opens with the discovery of a severed human arm snagged on a fishing line. The sets in motion Yancy’s quest to track down a missing con man and his scheming trophy wife. His search will take him from Key West to Miami to the Bahamas.

Satisfying from a mystery/comedy aspect, “Bad Monkey” also captures the captivating weirdness of the Sunshine State, that blend of redneck bohemia and big-money crassness mined so well in Hiaasen’s novels. 

Fleshed out with first-rate supporting players — among them Michelle Monaghan, Rob Delaney, Alex Moffat and Scott Glenn, just for starters — and you’ve got a show so good you don’t care if they ever solve the mystery.

Liev Schreiber, Nicole Kidman

“THE PERFECT COUPLE”(Netflix)

Okay, I get it.  Rich people are assholes.

 I’m just not sure I needed six hours of immersion in said asshole-ism .

“The Perfect Couple” is a murder mystery set on Nantucket Island during an obscenely expensive  wedding celebration.  At the end of the first episode, after a night of partying, one of the guests washes up dead on the beach.

The local police chief (Michel Beach) and a chijp-on-her-shoulder  detective (Donna Lynne Champlin) have plenty of suspects to suss out, and each of the ensuing five episodes centers on one  or two of the potential killers. 

The groom’s parents are the perfect couple of the title, though that’s a carefully curated illusion. The haughty/brittle Greer (Nicole Kidman) writes popular mystery novels, while hubby Tag (Liev Schreiber) smokes pot, lobs golf balls into the sea and spends wifey’s money on other women.

Their son the groom (Billy Howie) is actually a pretty decent guy; his bride-to-be  (Eve Hewson) is a middle-class girl uncomfortable with the ostentation in which she finds herself drowning.

The groom’s older brother (Jack Reynor) is a spoiled jerk and financial disaster; his preggers wife (Dakota Fanning)  is a social climber who puts up with her husband’s philandering because, well, he’s rich.

The maid of honor (Meghann Fahy) is a party girl; the best man (Ishaan Knatter) appears to be a surf bum but is actually a millionaire. And there’s a predatory and witheringly ironic French lady (Isabelle Adjani) who seems to have bedded most of the men in the wedding party.

There’s amusing interplay between the working-stiff cops and the nose-in-the-air suspects. But there are way too many superfluous subplots, digressions, red herrings and narrative dead ends. For much of the series I felt I was treading water…getting in my exercise but going nowhere.

Still, the performances are good (I especially dug Schreiber’s laid-back kept man) and the faces and figures attractive.

Aasif Mandi, Mike Colter, Katja Herbers

“EVIL” (Paramount +)

After three hugely satisfying seasons of “Evil” I’d like to hang out with series creators Michelle and Robert King. I mean, people who can effortlessly mix demonic possession and insouciant humor are bound to be fine dinner companions.

The series’s premise is simple yet deeply nuanced.  Three investigators are hired by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New  York to investigate reports of the supernatural.

They are seminarian David Acosta (Mike Colter), clinical psychologist and agnostic Kristen Bouchard (Katja Herbers) and lapsed Muslim and hardcore scientific rationalist Ben Shakir (Aasif Mandi).

There’s huge fun in watching the three play off each other…lots of good-natured banter as their conflicting world views collide (think Scully and Mulder plus one). And every week, of course, they have a new mystery to unravel, whether it’s a ghostly apparition, a fierce mutant pig or an ancient relic housing a malevolent spirit.

Creepy special effects and skin-crawling atmosphere aside, it’s the personal stories that really fuel the show.  Foremost is the simmering intensity between Colton’s priest-in-training and Herbers’ mother of four (or is it five?) that will have audiences simultaneously rooting for them to hit the hay together and dreading the repercussions.

There are numerous amusing supporting characters, especially Andrea Martin as a no-nonsense nun with the ability to see demons, Christine Lahti as Kristen’s cougar-ish mother and Michael Emerson as her boyfriend, a slimy psychiatrist heading a secret cabal of Satanists preparing for the birth of the antichrist.

And there are a whole mess of demons who’ll leave you torn between shuddering and giggling…who knew that Satan’s minions were disgruntled  working stiffs like the rest of us?

| Robert W. Butler

Read Full Post »

Andrew Rannells, Meryl Streep, James Corden, Nicole Kidman

“THE PROM”  My rating: B+

130 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

Sabre-toothed cynicism and squishy-hearted sentiment are unusual bedfellows, but they get it on quite swimmingly in “The Prom,” Ryan Murphy’s winning screen adaptation of the gay-centric Broadway musical.

Here’s a movie I’d pay to see in a theater.  And I say that from the depths of my pandemic-panicked heart.

Simultaneously a celebration/sendup of show-biz hamminess and a touching coming-out story, “The Prom” depicts how a handful of Broadway has-beens and wannabes descend upon a tiny Indiana burg to champion the cause of a teenage lesbian named Emma (a winning Jo Ellen Pellman) who only wants to take her gal to the high school prom.

That simple desire is complicated. First, because the PTA president Mrs. Greene (Kerry Washington) would rather cancel the prom than let a gay couple attend; second because Emma’s squeeze is none other than Mrs. Greene’s daughter Alyssa (Ariana DeBose), who is yet to come out to her mom.

Meanwhile in New  York, Broadway diva Dee Dee Allen (Meryl Streep) has been trashed for  her new musical about Eleanor Roosevelt.

“What didn’t they like?” asked co-star Barry Glickman (James Corden), who plays FDR. “Was it the hip hop?”

Actually, no.  The critics find Dee Dee and Barry to be insufferably narcissistic. They need an image makeover, something that will let them “love ourselves but appear to be caring human beings.”  Hey, what if they help out that little gay girl in Indiana?

They are joined on their mission  by Angie Dickinson (Nicole Kidman), who after 20 years in the biz is still stuck in the chorus, and actor/bartender Trent Oliver (Andrew Rannells), whose career high point is his degree from Juilliard.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Charlize Theron, Nicole Kidman

“BOMBSHELL”   My rating: B

108 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Simultaneously an insider’s look at Fox News, a record of the rise of Trump, and an examination of sexual harassment in the workplace, “Bombshell” can boast of terrific timeliness and a killer cast of women (and one man).

What it doesn’t have is much emotional pull — aside, of course, from the indignation it’s sure  to generate in response to the culture of crassness fomented by the late Roger Ailes.

Jay Roach’s film centers on three women struggling to forge and maintain careers at Fox  News.

Two of them — network stars Gretchen Carlson (Nicole Kidman) and Megyn Kelly (Charlize Theron) — are of course real people.  The third, a newcomer to the network named Kayla Pospisi (Margot Robbie), is fictional.

Early in Charles Randolph’s screenplay Carlson secretly meets with a couple of lawyers. She’s on thin ice at the network, both for her show’s ratings and her feminist inclinations (doing one broadcast sans makeup as a sort of statement of solidarity with women viewers). Her chafing at being Barbie-tized will likely lead to her demotion or dismissal; when that day comes she wants to have plenty of documentation about groping and sexual intimidation in the hallowed halls of Fox.

Meanwhile Kelly (Theron looks so eerily like the real Kelly that audiences will end up doing double takes) makes the mistake of daring to ask tough questions of then-candidate Trump and so becomes the public object of the Donald’s ridicule (“She had blood coming out of her whatever”). Suddenly she’s the story; it’s not a comfortable place to be.

Finally there’s Robbie’s Kayla, daughter of conservatives from Out West, evidently religious, and fiercely ambitious.  She learns the Fox ropes from her cubicle mate (Kate McKinnon), a closeted lesbian, but has to make a decision when given the choice of trading a blowjob for a promotion.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Nicole Kidman

“DESTROYER” My rating: C-

120 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Virtually everything about “Destroyer” — from its title to the plotting, dialogue and star Nicole Kidman’s Oscar-bait makeup transformation — screams overstatement.

Written by Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi and directed by Karyn Kusama, this joyless (and, let’s face it, off-putting) crime drama aspires to noir greatness but succeeds only in alienating with its blend of cliche and unearned angst.

Along the way it wastes Kidman, a hugely talented actress who here is limited to a sort of slow-burn psychosis.

When we first meet L.A. Police Det. Erin Bell (Kidman) she’s sleeping in her car, looking pretty much like death warmed over. Sunken eyes, sallow/blotchy skin, painfully projecting cheekbones, cracked lips.   Kidman is borderline unrecognizable; she could be a “Walking Dead” extra.

(In fact, we’re immediately reminded of Charlize Theron’s Oscar-winning uglying-down for “Monster.”)

Some 16 years ago Bell was part of an undercover operation that went horribly bad. Her partner Chris (played in flashbacks by Sebastian Stan) was killed by members of the bank robbery gang the two had infiltrated.

Now Bell receives a threat in the mail…a $100 bill stained with purple dye from that long-ago bank job.  It can only mean that Silas (Toby Kebbel), the gang leader who vanished shortly after the deadly heist, has returned to settle the score with Bell.

Bell has to get him first.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Nicole Kidman, Colin Farreell

“THE BEGUILED” My rating: C+

93 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Riding a tsunami of high expectations (she’s only the second woman to be named best director at Cannes), Sofia Coppola’s “The Beguiled” is poised to become the Second Coming of feminist cinema.

Except that it isn’t. Not even close.

It’s not a bad movie. “The Beguiled” (based on the same novel as the 1971 Don Siegel/Clint Eastwood version) is fiercely atmospheric and slyly subversive. It’s been well acted and the physical production is impressive.

But it’s emotionally remote and something of a bore.  Don Siegel may have been a pulp filmmaker, but his melodramatic instincts were fun, at least.

Coppola’s screenplay offers some new dialogue but the plot arc is mostly faithful to the earlier movie and the novel.

During the Civil War, a handful of teachers and students at a Virginia boarding school for women discover a wounded Union soldier, Corporal McBurney (Colin Farrell). They sew up his mangled leg, intending to turn him over to the rebel home guard when he’s healed.

But the presence of a potent male sets off yearnings among the residents. Among them is the outwardly formidable headmistress (Nicole Kidman), a lonely teacher (Kirsten Dunst), a spoiled teen on the cusp of sexuality (Elle Fanning), and even a small girl (Oona Laurence) looking for a playmate.

The canny bluebelly works the situation, becoming to each woman or girl just what she requires in this testosterone-starved environment.

Those looking for a fresh feminist twist to the material will be disappointed.  There’s less about women’s theory here than about the dark corners of the human psyche: sexual fear and repression, jealousy, revenge, exploitation. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Nicole Kidman

“QUEEN OF THE DESERT”  My rating: C+

129 minutes | MPAA rating PG-13

“Queen of the Desert” is quite possibly the oddest film of director Warner Herzog’s wildly idiosyncratic  career.

A mash-up of woman’s picture, real-life biography and sweeping  “Lawrence of Arabia” images, it stars Nicole Kidman as Gertrude Bell, a British adventuress, diplomat, archaeologist and feminist who became an expert on the Middle East in the years before World War I.

We first encounter our heroine in 1888. The daughter of a steel magnate, she’s being groomed for a fitting marriage.

“You will not scare the young men with your intelligence,” her mother warns, but Gertrude is having none of it. She’s too independent, too strong willed to endure simpering aristocratic society.

(Kidman, now 49, plays Bell from age 21 to 40. Remarkably, she pulls off the youthful Gertrude, thanks to great makeup and God-given bone structure.)

Her exasperated father finally agrees to let her join the British embassy in Teheran where she soon finds herself falling for Henry  Cadogan (James Franco, struggling to maintain a Brit accent), a low-ranking staff member assigned as her escort. Henry’s prospects aren’t promising, but like Gertrude he loves the desert. And he’s not afraid of her independent streak.

Daddy, however, nixes this liaison, and a heartbroken Gertrude turns her back on romance, devoting herself to travels in the Middle East, crossing vast deserts with a handful of faithful local guides.

During her travels she runs across a young T.E. Lawrence (Robert Pattinson), working on an archaeological dig at Petra in Jordan. Years away from his exploits among the Arab tribes in the Great War, Lawrence already wears the native costume that will become his trademark.  He and Gertrude flirt innocently, but neither is looking for a relationship.

Over years Gertrude is befriended by the Bedouin. She also finds a lover — platonic — in married British statesman Charles Doughty-Wylie (Damien Lewis).

Eventually Gertrude is recognized by her government and with Lawrence is part of the commission that divides up the Middle East in the wake of the war.

 

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Sunny Pawer

Sunny Pawer

“LION” My rating: B+

118 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

Half Dickensian epic, half heart-wrenching domestic drama, “Lion” tells a real-life story so unlikely that it stretches credulity.

But it happened.

In 1986 five-year-old Saroo (Sunny Pawer, in one of the most astonishing performances by a young child ever captured on film)  was living with his widowed mother and two siblings in a rural area of central India.  His mother worked as a laborer (she literally lifted rocks all day); Saroo and an older brother stole lumps of coal from passing trains,  trading them for food.

On one nighttime outing, Saroo was separated from his brother and found himself locked inside an empty passenger train being driven more than 1,000 miles to Calcutta to be decommissioned.

Little Saroo didn’t know his family’s last name or the town he hailed from. Worse, he spoke only Hindi, while the Calcuttans spoke Bengali.

For months the child lived on the street — begging, stealing, avoiding capture by criminals seeking child prostitutes. After several close calls Saroo found himself in an orphanage where, miraculously enough, he was paired with an Australian couple, John and Sue Brierley (David Wenham, Nicole Kidman).

Relocated to middle-class comfort in Tasmania, the lost boy seemed to have washed up in paradise.  Not even the addition to the family of his troubled adopted brother, Mantosh — like Saroo an Indian orphan but with severe emotional and social issues — could seriously erode the fairy-tale quality of Saroo’s good fortune.

(By the way, John and Sue seem pretty good candidates for sainthood.)

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Julia Roberts

Julia Roberts

“SECRET IN THEIR EYES” My rating: C

111 minutes | MPAA rating: PG-13

Some stories cannot be transplanted from one culture to another without losing much in the process.

Such is the case with “Secret in Their Eyes,” an American remake of an Argentine release which in 2010 won the Oscar for best foreign language film.

The story arcs of the two films are pretty much interchangeable. Both feature a chase through a packed sports stadium, and each ends with a head-spinning last-act revelation capable of inducing a tummy full of dread.

And yet the particulars are different enough that what worked magnificently in one version sputters and dies in the other.

This film from writer/director Billy Ray (“Shattered Glass,” “Breach”) is presented as two interlocking stories taking place in two decades.

In the present former FBI agent (now he handles security for the New York Mets) Ray (Chiwetel Ejiofor) returns to his old haunts in Los Angeles to complete some unfinished business.

For 13 years Ray has been haunted by the murder of young Caroline Cobb, whose mother Jess (Julia Roberts) was a colleague and investigator for the L.A. District Attorney’s Office.

Ray and Jess were part of a task force looking for terrorist activity originating in a local mosque. The most likely murder suspect was a oddball young man and a member of that congregation.

But the D.A. (Alfred Molina) kept throwing roadblocks in front of the murder investigation. Eventually it was revealed that the suspect was a confidential informant reporting on activities at the mosque. Killer or not, the powers that be are kept him out of the legal system. Given the rampant paranoia after 9/11, they decided that preventing another terrorist attack trumps solving a young woman’s murder.

Despite lacking legal authorization or jurisdiction, Ray and Jess (Roberts has dowdied herself into near-unrecognizability) went after the suspect on their own. They were cautiously abetted by Claire (Nicole Kidman), a new prosecutor for whom Ray had (and continues to have) a raging case of unrequited love/lust.

But the suspect vanishes and the trail went cold.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Colin Firth, Nicole Kidman

Colin Firth, Nicole Kidman

“THE RAILWAY MAN”  My rating: B- (Now showing at the Glenwood Arts)

116 minutes | MPAA rating: R

Knowing that the story told in “The Railway Man” is more or less true is essential to appreciating Jonathan Teplitzky’s film.

For there are moments here – lots of them – when I felt I’d been conned into a clumsily structured, overly earnest “lesson” film.

The story begins with a bit of deceptive  romance.  Sixtyish Eric Lomax (Colin Firth) is a British bachelor who loves trains.  He’s not a trainspotter, he emphasizes, but a “train enthusiast.”  This being 1980 in jolly olde England, there are plenty of trains to take pleasure in.

On one such train he runs into Patti (Nicole Kidman), a recently divorced woman whom he helps plana trip to Scotland.  Eric may not be terribly adept socially, but he apparently has the schedule of every train in Britain committed to memory.

As they cruise through the countryside, Eric regales her with bits of local history.  One town, he notes, was where the film “Brief Encounter” was shot…a nice observation since Eric and Patti seem to be living their own version of that classic movie.

So…”The Railway Man” is a sweet,  late-in-life love story?

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »